Review




Structured Review

Mirada Medical Limited multiple atlas mirada
Auto‐contouring methods reported for delineation of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy
Multiple Atlas Mirada, supplied by Mirada Medical Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/multiple+atlas+mirada/multiple+atlas+mirada/pmc11686467-27-18-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multiple atlas mirada - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy – A state‐of‐the‐art review"

Article Title: Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy – A state‐of‐the‐art review

Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13668

Auto‐contouring methods reported for delineation of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy
Figure Legend Snippet: Auto‐contouring methods reported for delineation of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy

Techniques Used: Imaging, Derivative Assay, Software, Diagnostic Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Modification, Blocking Assay, Construct

Related Articles

Biomarker Discovery:

Article Title: Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy – A state‐of‐the‐art review
Article Snippet: 9 , Maffei et al . (2020) , Breast , RT sim CT NCE (No breathing info) , Atlas RayStation Single atlas Commercial , 25 WH LA, LV, RA, RV AA, PA, IVC, SVC LV segments Cx segments Coronary sinus Duane et al . , 36 , 10 , DSC HD ΔVol (cm 3 & %) , – , 4‐point Likert scale (contour quality) , ABS module in RayStation; single atlas selected and registered with DIR (ANACONDA, anatomically constrained deformation) Evaluated variations in number of atlas cases used, determined more is better. Assessed hierarchical clustering of atlases and different constraints (e.g., lung contours as barriers) IOV reported on test set (second observer). .. 10 , Choi et al . (2020) , Breast , RT sim CT CE* (No breathing info) , Multiple Atlas Mirada & MIM DL 3D CNN (DenseNet) Commercial and in‐house , 6 LA, LV, RA, RV LAD, RCA No guidelines specified , 35 (atlas) 48 (DL)^ , 14 , DSC HD95 , – , – , *Sensitivity analysis conducted using NCE CT, but this did not include cardiac substructures ^DL method used same 35 cases as the atlas method plus 13 additional validation scans Also evaluated auto‐contouring for breast CTVs and other OARs using the same methods DL superior to atlas for cardiac substructure delineation. .. 11 , Loap et al . (2020) , Breast , RT Sim CT NCE 3D FB , Atlas Mirada Commercial , 10 WH LA, LV, RA, RV LV segments LAD, RCA, LCX Duane et al . , 20 , 20 , DSC Vol , – , – , Failed to implement coronary artery segmentation (thought to be due to their size and inter‐patient variability) Demonstrated reduction in delineation time.



Similar Products

90
Mirada Medical Limited multiple atlas mirada
Auto‐contouring methods reported for delineation of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy
Multiple Atlas Mirada, supplied by Mirada Medical Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/multiple+atlas+mirada/multiple+atlas+mirada/pmc11686467-27-18-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multiple atlas mirada - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Auto‐contouring methods reported for delineation of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy

Journal: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Article Title: Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy – A state‐of‐the‐art review

doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13668

Figure Lengend Snippet: Auto‐contouring methods reported for delineation of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy

Article Snippet: 10 , Choi et al . (2020) , Breast , RT sim CT CE* (No breathing info) , Multiple Atlas Mirada & MIM DL 3D CNN (DenseNet) Commercial and in‐house , 6 LA, LV, RA, RV LAD, RCA No guidelines specified , 35 (atlas) 48 (DL)^ , 14 , DSC HD95 , – , – , *Sensitivity analysis conducted using NCE CT, but this did not include cardiac substructures ^DL method used same 35 cases as the atlas method plus 13 additional validation scans Also evaluated auto‐contouring for breast CTVs and other OARs using the same methods DL superior to atlas for cardiac substructure delineation.

Techniques: Imaging, Derivative Assay, Software, Diagnostic Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Modification, Blocking Assay, Construct